Legal Opinion

Henke & Pillot, Inc. v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butchers Workmen, No. 408

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 7, 1937No. 10674Published

1Opinion

On Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing.

GRAVES, Justice

Without questioning any of the fact-findings supporting the whole of it, and accepting so much as was an affirmance of its own right to peacefully picket as against Henke & Pillot, Inc., the appellee union’s motion for rehearing assails only that part of this court’s former judgment directing such modification of the trial court’s order as to protect the intervener appellant in its right to carry out its employment contract with the appellant company; in doing so its main contentions are: First, that this court’s opinion is in direct conflict…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Southland Life Insurance v. EganTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Harding v. PearsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Nagy v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Midland Building & Loan Ass'n v. Sparks Chapel Colored M. E. Church in AmericaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API