Legal Opinion

Schwinghammer v. Alexander

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1968No. 11066PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice:

Plaintiffs commenced this action for damages for defective and incomplete construction of their home against the contractor-seller, Alexander, and the mortgagee, Prudential. The trial court determined in the second cause of action that plaintiffs were third-party beneficiaries of an escrow agreement between Prudential and Alexander-and awarded judgment to the plaintiffs. Prudential appeals.

In January 1965 plaintiffs executed an earnest money agreement with Alexander to purchase a home. Alexander agreed to complete the home including the unfinished basement area, which…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bennion v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  2. Krause v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  3. Richardson Associates v. Lincoln-Devore, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Ringwood v. Foreign Auto Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  5. Broadwater v. Old Republic SuretyUtah Supreme Court · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API