Novak v. Triangle Steel Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceClinton, J.
I concur generally in the majority opinion. What follows, will, I hope, make apparent the reason for a separate concurrence. I think it may be conceded that the plaintiff did not know until November 1974 that he had suffered a new and different accidental injury to his back on October 23, 1973. It is hardly conceivable that had he been informed by his.doctor after the surgery in January of 1974, that that surgery involved a different disc from that in the previous surgery, he would not have promptly made claim for workmen’s compensation. It should be equally clear that, had the plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brokaw v. RobinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
- Borowski v. Armco Steel CorporationNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
- Ohnmacht v. Peter Kiewit Sons Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1965
- Turner v. Beatrice Foods Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957