Legal Opinion

Tubianosa v. Derwinski

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided September 9, 1992No. 90-893PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEINBERG, Associate Judge:

On July 16, 1992, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary) moved the Court to grant reconsideration, or review by a panel, in order to vacate or modify a July 2, 1992, single-judge memorandum decision in this case. In that prior decision, 3 Vet.App. 208, the Court had remanded a March 16, 1990, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) denying service connection for the cause of the appellant’s husband’s death, and, therefore, her reopened claim for dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC). The Court had vacated the decision and remanded the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Colvin v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  2. Masors v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  3. Espiritu v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  4. Fugere v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  5. Jones v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Robinson v. MansfieldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2008
  2. Savage v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
  3. Alfonso Medrano v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
  4. Sandra K. Hupp v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
  5. Glover Norvell v. James B. PeakeUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API