Legal Opinion
Glover Norvell v. James B. Peake
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided July 14, 2008No. 06-2145PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAGEL, Judge:
Glover Norvell appeals through counsel an April 28, 2006, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) that denied entitlement to compensation pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of a bilateral orchiectomy performed on February 23, 2001, based on an additional disability as a result of VA medical treatment. Because the Board’s determination that Mr. Nor-vell’s current pain was not caused by his February 2001 surgery was not clearly erroneous, and because any issue with respect to VA’s duty to request quality assurance reports fails to present a current case or…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Tom L. Ashlock v. Conseco Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- L.E. Johnson v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2010
- Carmen J. Cardona v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014
- 09-39 084Board of Veterans' Appeals · 2014
- Alvin Demery v. R Obert L. W IlkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2019
- Cecil E. Hem Bree v. Robert L. WilkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.