Legal Opinion

Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Refuse Gardens, Inc.

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided April 15, 1993No. File 364240PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAronson, J.

This action was commenced with a return day of July 18,1989. The plaintiff, the Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority, filed a motion seeking a prejudgment remedy in the amount of $1,009,286.38. The plaintiff claims that this sum represents its cost to date in responding to contamination emanating from a landfill formerly owned by the defendants and purchased by the plaintiff in 1986. The defendants deny responsibility for the cost. The landfill, located in Ellington, was acquired by the plaintiff from the named defendant, Refuse Gardens, Inc. (Refuse), on July 7,1986. On July 18,1986,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Town of Winchester v. Connecticut State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. DeFonce Construction Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Refuse Gardens, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Coastline Terminals of Connecticut, Inc. v. USX Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
  3. Sealy Connecticut, Inc. v. Litton Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
  4. Schiavone v. PearceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
  5. Accashian v. City of Danbury, No. X01 Uwy Cv-97 0417228s (Jan. 8, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API