Legal Opinion
Sealy Connecticut, Inc. v. Litton Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 9, 2000No. 3:94CV711(JBA)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum of Decision-Phase I
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sealy Connecticut, Inc. (“Sealy”) has brought suit to recover its remediation costs under Section 107 1 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a) (“CERCHA”), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6972(a)(1)(A), (a)(1)(B) and invokes supplemental jurisdiction over its state law claims 2 including Conn.Gen.Stat. § 22a-452. It seeks to recover its cost of remed-iating the soil and groundwater contamination on a part of the real property it owns in Watertown,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Prisco v. A & D Carting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Bedford Affiliates v. SillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Plaskon Electronic Materials, Inc. v. Allied-Signal, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995
- G.J. Leasing Company, Incorporated, Doing Business as Cahokia Marine Service and S.I. Enterprises, L.P. v. Union Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Castaic Lake Water Agency v. Whittaker Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Calabrese v. McHughDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Yankee Gas Services Co. v. UGI Utilities, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Durham Manufacturing Co. v. Merriam Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.