Legal Opinion
David Ulitsch v. Commissioner of the U.S. Social Security Administration
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided September 26, 2019No. 18-cv-694-JLPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE David Ulitsch v. Civil No. 18-cv-694-JL Opinion No.
2019 DNH 167
Commissioner of the U.S. Social Security Administration ORDER ON APPEAL David Ulitsch has filed two motions1 to reverse and remand the Social Security Administration’s (“SSA”) decision to deny his application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. An administrative law judge (“ALJ”) at SSA found that Ulitsch, despite severe impairments, retains the residual functional capacity (“RFC”) to perform light exertional work, subject to certain limitations, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Lucia v. SECSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Seavey v. Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ulitsch v. US Social Security Administration, CommissionerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2019