Legal Opinion

Ulitsch v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided September 26, 2019No. 1:18-cv-00694Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE David Ulitsch v. Civil No. 18-cv-694-JL Opinion No.

2019 DNH 167

Commissioner of the U.S. Social Security Administration ORDER ON APPEAL David Ulitsch has filed two motions1 to reverse and remand the Social Security Administration’s (“SSA”) decision to deny his application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. An administrative law judge (“ALJ”) at SSA found that Ulitsch, despite severe impairments, retains the residual functional capacity (“RFC”) to perform light exertional work, subject to certain limitations, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. Lucia v. SECSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. Seavey v. Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API