Thomas v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Cureton, Judge:
This is an action for injunction. The sole question presented is whether the respondents Kathyrn Vereen Mitchell and Deborah G. Vereen should be required to remove a locked cable erected across an easement owned by the appellant A. C. Thomas, Jr., which crosses their agricultural lands. The action was referred to the master-in-equity who determined that the servient estate could burden the dominant estate with the gate. We affirm.
In 1974 Thomas purchased 53.30 acres of land from Eu gene Vereen, father of the respondents. The tract was separated from the public road by other…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Klutts Resort Realty, Inc. v. Down'Round Development Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Chesson v. . JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Hall v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Watson v. HokeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
- Parker v. T & C Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gabriel v. WoodMontana Supreme Court · 1993
- Friarsgate, Inc. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- K & a Acquisition Group, LLC v. Island Pointe, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Murrells Inlet Corp. v. WardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Van Blarcum v. City of North Myrtle BeachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.