Legal Opinion

Cole v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 4, 1990No. 1493 September Term, 1989PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOYLAN, Judge.

The appellant, Paul Martin Cole, was convicted by a Carroll County jury of a sexual offense in the second degree. Upon this appeal, he raises the following three contentions:

1. That the evidence was not legally sufficient to sustain the conviction;

2. That the trial judge erroneously admitted as rebuttal evidence prior consistent statements made by the ten-year-old victim; and

3. That the trial judge erroneously denied the appellant’s motion for a new trial after the discovery of allegedly exculpatory evidence.

On Saturday, October 29, 1988, the appellant was living with Barbara…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. The People v. DamenIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Shoemaker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Murphy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  5. Finke v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. LicataMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. LavalleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. MartinezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. State v. KendricksTennessee Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API