Legal Opinion

Mortensen v. Dayton Sand & Gravel Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action on an account stated. It is alleged in the complaint:

“II.
“That the plaintiff at the request of the defendant performed services for the defendant for a period of about twelve years, and that on the 1st day of January, 1932, at Dayton, Oregon, the plaintiff and the defendant had an accounting to and concerning all their accounts and that it was ascertained and agreed by and between the plaintiff and defendant that the defendant was justly and legally indebted to the plaintiff on the said 1st day of January, 1932, in the full sum of $974.64.
“III.
“That the said defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Foste v. Standard InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hurd v. Central Utah Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Guadalupe Guadalupe v. RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1950
  4. Guadalupe Guadalupe v. RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API