Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hickey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 10, 1980No. 53936, CA 14824PublishedCited by 6 opinions

JOSEPH, P.J.

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, P.J.

In an action for specific performance of an irrevocable option granted in a lease between the parties, the trial court ruled that the failure of plaintiff to pay property taxes as agreed was a breach of the lease agreement and therefore denied the requested relief. Plaintiff assigns as errors: (1) failure to decree specific performance after defendant testified that he would have allowed plaintiff to execute the option; (2) the finding that the failure to pay taxes was a breach of the agreement; and (3) the finding that defendant had not waived the breach. We review de novo. Larson v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Percy v. MILLEROregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Comstock Mfg. Co. v. SchiffmannOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Larson v. TrachselOregon Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Entrepreneur, Ltd. v. YasunaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. C & K Market, Inc. v. RoccasalvaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. KMT Enterprises, Inc. v. NyssenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Willamette Landing Apartments - 89, LLC v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Cascade International Investment Co. v. KeeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API