Legal Opinion
Cabanas v. Gloodt Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 3, 1998No. 96-17081UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
141 F.3d 1174
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Burt CABANAS; BMC--the Benchmark Management Company, Inc.,
d/b/a Benchmark Management Company, Plaintiffs--Appellants,
v.
GLOODT ASSOCIATES, INC; Peter H. Gloodt; Karen Bradbury
Johnson; Peter A. Moegenburg, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 96-17081.
DC No. CV-94-01481-DFL/PAW.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bagdadi v. NazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
- J'Aire Corp. v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Brewer v. Second Baptist ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Paulsen v. CNF INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Google LLC v. Point Financial, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025