Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Kurtz

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided January 27, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Steven W. Paynter, J.

The defendant has moved at the conclusion of the trial in this matter to dismiss the information on the ground that it was improperly amended thereby rendering it facially insufficient and depriving the court of jurisdiction. Similar motions were made when the amendment was effected before another Judge and at a subsequent calendar call before a third Judge.

*981The original information charged the defendant with aggravated harassment in the second degree as well as harassment in the second degree under sections 240.30 and 240.25 of the Penal Law. The…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Livingston v. WyattNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. People v. SpannNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. ZambounisNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. MacFawn v. KreslerNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. People v. NuccioNew York Court of Appeals · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. MartinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2009
  2. People v. HallAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2004
  3. People v. WarrenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
  4. People v. AlmendarezNassau County District Court · 2009
  5. People v. Hardy (Edward)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API