Legal Opinion
People v. Martin
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided April 7, 2009PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
On the court’s own motion, the appeals are consolidated for purposes of disposition.
Judgment of conviction reversed, on the law, and a new trial ordered.
Order reversed without costs and designation vacated.
The information charged defendant with forcible touching (Penal Law § 130.52 [2]). The accusatory portion thereof provided in pertinent part as follows:
Ҥ 130.52 FORCIBLE TOUCHING
“A PERSON IS GUILTY OF FORCIBLE TOUCHING WHEN SUCH PERSON INTENTIONALLY, AND FOR NO LEGITIMATE PURPOSE, FORCIBLY TOUCHES THE SEXUAL OR OTHER INTIMATE PARTS OF ANOTHER PERSON:
“2. FOR…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People of State of New York v. GregaNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. EastonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- People v. GachelinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. IqbalAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2011
- People v. HusainAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
- People v. LevyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2011
- People v. Adames (Maximo)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2025
- People v. Hardy (Edward)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.