Legal Opinion
Citizens' State Bank v. Nore
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 8, 1903No. 11,893PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Error from the district court for Boone county. Action by innocent purchaser upon promissory note given for medical services. Plea that payee was not a legally qual ified physician. Note held void. Tried below before Thompson, J. Judgment for defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
Lobingier, C.
This is an action on a promissory note, payable six months after date, given by the defendant in error to one F. N. Brett for medical services rendered to the former’s wife. At the time of the excution of the note, and as a part of the same transaction, Brett executed and delivered to defendant in error the following instrument:
“American Medical and Surgical Institute,
“For the Treatment of All Chronic, Private and Nervous Diseases, both Medical and Surgical.
“Albion, Nebr., Sept. 7,1898.
“Received of L. Nore twenty-two dollars, for which I hereby agree to treat L. Nore’s wife for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crawford v. SpencerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Sondheim v. GilbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Puckett v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Snoddy v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Underwood v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Modern Industrial Bank v. TaubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
- First Nat. Bank of Price v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1920
- State Electro-Medical Institute v. PlatnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Lockney State Bank v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Finseth v. SchererSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.