Warren Lee Hill, Jr. v. Carl Humphrey
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Concurrence
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, specially
concurring:
I concur only in the court’s judgment. I cannot quibble with the court’s finding that Supreme Court precedent does not prevent the State of Georgia from applying a beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard to Hill’s claim that he is mentally retarded. However, I do not believe we ought to reach this conclusion for two reasons. First, burdens of proof are procedural rules and are governed by laws pertaining to procedural due process. Second, Hill raised his mental retardation claim — and the associated claim regarding the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.