Legal Opinion

Holmes & Bull Furniture Co. v. Hedges

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1896No. 2135PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County — Hon. W. H. Pritchard, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

This proceeding was instituted to compel the appellant, tb& county treasurer of Pierce county, to pay a warrant of School District No. 10, held by respondent, or to endorse upon such warrant the statutory endorsement, “Presented for payment and not paid for want of funds,” if appellant as treasurer had not sufficient available funds to pay it.

The application for the writ shows that at the time of the creation of the debt represented by the warrant in question, School District No. 10 aforesaid was in debt largely in excess of one and one-half…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miller v. MarxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Parker County v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  3. People v. HogeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Baker v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  5. People ex rel. Chicago & Rock River Railroad v. DutcherIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ladd v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Robb v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Varney v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Orchard v. Board of Com'rs of Sierra CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Spring Water Co. v. Town of MonroeWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API