Solomon v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
Clarence Solomon appeals his conviction for driving under the influence, AS 28.35.030(a). At his trial, Solomon introduced evidence that his intoxication stemmed from his ingestion of approximately one quart of NyQuil® cold medicine. Solomon further claimed that he did not read the label on the NyQuil bottles (which stated that NyQuil contained 10 percent alcohol), and that he remained unaware that NyQuil contained alcohol or that NyQuil might otherwise be an intoxicant.
Based on this evidence, Solomon asked the trial judge to instruct the jury that he should be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. GuestAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. WallaceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- State v. HazelwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jordan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Mowery v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Wagner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2017
- Jordan and Letendre v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2016
- Richard Dorsey v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.