Legal Opinion

Gibbons v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1981No. 11355PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of kidnapping and sexual assault. During the trial two police matrons were allowed to testify in great detail concerning what the victim told them about the incident after its occurrence.

“Such testimony is hearsay, and was inadmissible in evidence except in her [the victim’s] cross-examination, or as confirmatory of her story if attacked.” State v. Campbell, 20 Nev. 122, 126, 17 P. 620, 623 (1888).

The testimony was admitted by the trial court under the “res gestae” exception to the hearsay rule; however the testimony clearly was not admissible under any…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SchimmelpfennigWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. CampbellNevada Supreme Court · 1888
  3. George v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. State v. UrbauerArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  5. United States v. Roy RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Daly v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Patterson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Crew v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Cunningham v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API