Kelly v. Matlock
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles-County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
The appellants and one Ausmus, for the accommodation of the respondent, executed to him their two promissory notes for one thousand dollars and fifteen hundred dollars, respectively, which notes were negotiated by the respondent; and upon his failure to meet them, they were paid and taken up by the appellants.
The respondent and his wife, to secure the appellants and Ausmus from loss on these accommodation notes, executed to them a mortgage on an undivided interest in certain real estate in the state of Oregon owned by the respondent. He also assigned and delivered to them, as further…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chester v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by11 opinions
- Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Beatty v. Pacific States Savings and Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- McArthur v. MageeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings & Trust Ass'n v. ReidyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Johnson v. Mortgage Guarantee Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.