Bagwell v. Pennsylvania Department of Education
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurrence
CONCURRING OPINION BY
Judge McCullough.
I concur in the result reached by the Majority. I write separately to address my concerns regarding the record before the Office of Open Records (OOR) and to expound upon the Majority’s discussion of whether, or under what circumstances, the attorney work-product and attorney-client privileges can be waived under the Right-to-Know Law (RTKL).1
Regarding the record created before the OOR, it is not clear the OOR had “the *422necessary, requisite information and evidence before it to properly adjudicate the matter,” (op. at 413, citing OOR’s Final Determination…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Office of the Governor v. ScolforoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. KennedySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- LaValle v. OFFICE OF GEN. COUNSEL OF COM.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. MaguiganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.