Legal Opinion

People v. Rawley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1925No. Docket No. 113PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Defendant took out a license under Act No. 85, Pub. Acts 1923. He erected a tent on a vacant lot in Flint and there sold the articles enumerated in the act. He also sold some confectionery. He did not pay the license fee provided for in Act No. 294, Pub. Acts 1913 (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 7001 et seq.), which in Flint would amount to $20 a day for the first five days and $10 a day thereafter. He was convicted of a violation of the last named act and reviews his conviction on exceptions before sentence. We need not determine whether the provisions of section 6 of the act of 1923 exempts payment…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Vernor v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Brazee v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Noel v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. City Council v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. City of Grand Rapids v. BraudyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Lansing Municipal JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Unemployment Compensation Commission v. RennerWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  3. McGriff v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API