Legal Opinion
Cheesman v. Shreeve
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado
Decided December 26, 1889PublishedCited by 21 opinions
At Law. Action of ejectment.
1Opinion of the Court
Philips, J.,
(charging jury.j Gentlemen of the jury: Before proceeding to give you the charge I have prepared, I will give you certain declarations of law, asked for by the plaintiffs, as not inapplicable to the consideration of this case:
“The court, at the instance of the plaintiffs, charges the jury that their verdict must be for the plaintiffs, unless the defendarits fully establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, the following facts, — that is to say, that they are the owners of a lode mining claim located and held in compliance with the statutes of the United States and the state of…
2Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co., Ltd., & Hugh Brown, United States of America v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co., Ltd., and Hugh BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Kahle v. Crown Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Durant Min. Co. v. Percy Consol. Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Grand Central Min. Co. v. Mammoth Min. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1905
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.