Legal Opinion

Aderhold v. Edwards

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1934No. 7393PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

Steve Edwards, Jr., and one Carl Pearl in May, 1933, pleaded guilty to a count of an indictment which charged that they “unlawfully a,nd feloniously did manufacture intoxicating liquor, without having a permit as required by law.” Edwards was sentenced to imprisonment for three years, and committed to “some penal institution” to be designated by the Attorney General. In April, 1934, after serving ten months in the Atlanta Penitentiary, which was designated by the Attorney General as the place of confinement, he sued out a writ of habeas corpus by which he sought to be set…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Schwab v. BerggrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Holden v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Ex Parte KarstendickSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Ex parte GivinsDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1920

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  2. Willard Junior Chunn v. J. J. Clark, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Henry Bateman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  4. Nick George Montos v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  5. United States v. WrightDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API