Legal Opinion
United States v. Michigan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 4, 1994No. Nos. 93-1222, 93-1810PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, Circuit Judge.
The United States filed this ease to require the State of Michigan to bring the conditions in several Michigan prisons up to constitutional standards. In 1984, the United States and Michigan agreed to a consent decree, which was entered by the district court. In April 1992, the parties filed a joint motion requesting that the court dismiss portions of the consent decree because Michigan had substantially complied with the terms of the decree and because all but one of the disputed conditions had been brought into Compliance with constitutional standards. The parties…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. VukovichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Hadix v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
- Gary Knop, Cross-Appellants v. Perry M. Johnson, Cross-Appellees. Everett Hadix v. Perry M. Johnson, Individually and as Director of the Michigan Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
3Cited by8 opinions
- Margaret Woods v. Robert LecureuxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Hadix v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Johnson v. HeffronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Johnson v. HeffronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. State Of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.