Legal Opinion
Tuggle v. Tribble
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 28, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
Act No. 611. of the Acts of 1923, amending' § 7328 of Kirby’s Digest (now § 5249 of Crawford & Moses’ Digest) provides for the opening of new roads and changing old roads, the same to be located on section lines as near as may be, taking into consideration the convenience of public travel, contour of the country, etc. The procedure to he followed is prescribed in the act.
This action was begun by A. H. Tribble and other property owners of Garland County, under the above statute, by filing petitions in the county court asking for certain changes to be made in the location of part of what is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wulff v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Drainage District No. 7 v. StuartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Hempstead County v. Howard CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. PlottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Brown v. KirklandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pike Avenue Development Co. v. Pulaski CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Gibson v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Titsworth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Woollard v. LightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- Worley v. River Oaks Water Improvement District No. 48Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.