Legal Opinion

Hauser v. . Furniture Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1917PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The action was to recover damages for physical injuries suffered by plaintiff, a minor, when in the company's factory as an employee, contrary to the provisions of the statute (Pell's Revisal, sec. 1981b), and attributed also to positive negligence on the part of defendant.

On denial of liability and plea of contributory negligence, the jury rendered the following verdict:

1. Was the plaintiff, at the time of his alleged injury, under 13 years of age, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes.

2. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer:…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Davenport.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Leathers v. Blackwell Durham Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Carleton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Rolin v. . Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. McNeill v. . McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Smith v. . KappasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Ryals v. . Contracting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Ryals v. Carolina Contracting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API