Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Zekany

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1991No. 90CA0162Published

1Dissent

Judge DUBOFSKY

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. In my view, the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that intoxication was an affirmative defense to the charge of universal malice/extreme indifference murder.

Universal malice/extreme indifference murder is one of several forms of murder included in our first degree murder statute. See § 18-3-102(1), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8B). Since the consequences for committing first degree murder are greater than those for second degree murder, the mens rea and/or actions which justify a conviction in the former category must be different and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. WienersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  3. Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. People v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Gautney v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API