Legal Opinion

PT Indonesia Epson Industry v. Orient Overseas Container Line, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided May 15, 2002No. 99-3373-CIVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment Against Orient Overseas Container Line

JORDAN, District Judge.

For the reasons set forth below, the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment against Orient Overseas Container Line [D.E.30] is Denied.

Summary Judgment Standard

Summary judgment “shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). A…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Allen v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Hilburn v. Murata Electronics North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Swift Textiles, Inc. v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API