Legal Opinion

Gray v. Coomer

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided September 9, 1988No. Civ. A. C-86-0173-BG(M)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MEREDITH, District Judge.

The above-styled action is before the Court upon a variety of pending motions. Motions filed by the defendants which are currently pending include: (1) Motion to Dismiss; (2) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; (3) Motion for More Definite Statement; and (4) Motion for Summary Judgment. Similarly, the plaintiffs have filed a Motion to Amend Complaint. Jurisdiction for this action is based upon alleged violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 et seq. Generally, these alleged violations involve…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API