Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Walrad

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1919Published

From Multnomah: Robert G-. Morrow, Judge. In Banc. Action by J. C. Schultz and E. V. Maulding against' B. L. Walrad. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appealed. Motion to dismiss appeal.

1Opinion

Denied May 20, 1919.

Petition for Rehearing.

(179 Pac. 991.)

On petition for a rehearing on motion to dismiss an appeal. Appeal Dismissed. Rehearing Denied.

Mr. Milo C. King, for the petition.

Mr. Frank Schlegel, contra.

PEE CURIAM.

This is a petition for rehearing upon the order made dismissing defendant’s appeal: Ante, p. 315 (179 Pac. 904).

2. In the petition and affidavit accompanying it, it is set np that previous to the notice of appeal, which appears in the transcript, upon which the motion to dismiss was based, the appellant’s attorney served a notice of appeal upon Prank Schlegel, attorney…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reed v. AllisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Schultz v. WalradOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Fisk v. HuntOregon Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API