Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Walrad

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Multnomah: Robert G-. Morrow, Judge. In Banc. Action by J. C. Schultz and E. V. Maulding against' B. L. Walrad. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appealed. Motion to dismiss appeal.

1Per curiam

1. This is a motion to dismiss an appeal.

Judgment was entered against defendant on December 5, 1918. Notice of appeal was served on January 20,1919. Before the notice was served, and on January 14, 1919, the defendant applied for, and secured from the Circuit Court, an order extending the time within which to file the transcript on appeal until March 15, 1919. No other extension was granted and plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal.

*316The court had ho jurisdiction to extend the time for filing a transcript on appeal until a notice of appeal had been served: Wolf v. City Ry. Co., 50 Or. 64 (85…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kelley v. PikeOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Wolf v. City Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Northwestern Clearance Co. v. JenningsOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Brown v. RittermanOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Schultz v. WalradOregon Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API