Legal Opinion
Akerson v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 13, 1966No. 155-64; No. 156-64; No. 157-64; No. 158-64; No. 159-64; No. 160-64; No. 161-64PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLaramore, Judge
These consolidated actions are brought ,by some 1,800 plaintiffs to recover additional retired pay for the period June 1, 1958 to October 1, 1963. Each plaintiff is a retired officer, or legal representative of a deceased officer, of one of the Armed Forces, the Public Health Service or the Coast and Geodetic Survey. Prior to June 1, 1958, each officer represented here was receiving retired pay computed as a percentage of the “monthly basic pay” of his retired grade. See, e.g., 10 U.S.C. §3991 (Army), §6325 (Navy), §8991 (Air Force) (1958 Ed.). As a general rule, the retired grade was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Louis E. Fagan (Lewis L. Gover, No. 2) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
3Cited by6 opinions
- Abbott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Loeh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Ward v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Arnold Cornman v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Arnold Cornman v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.