City of Barre v. New Hampshire Insurance
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtLarrow, J.
This is an action brought upon a “builder’s risk” policy of insurance, under which the plaintiffs were named insureds. It was originally purchased by City of Barre, for reasons not here material no longer a party in this action. The premises insured were a recreation building being constructed for the City by plaintiff R. E. Bean Construction Company, Inc., also a named insured. The trial court made extensive findings and conclusions, and rendered judgment for the defendant upon the general ground that the loss was within a specific exclusion under the terms of the policy. We disagree, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1975
- Equitable Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Allied Steel Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Enosburg Falls v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- U. S. Industries, Inc., Wyatt Industries, Inc., and Steel Tank Construction Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- City of Burlington v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2002
- American Protection Insurance v. McMahanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.