Legal Opinion

Line v. Spies

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1905No. Docket No. 4PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Menominee; Stone, J. Case by Charles Line against Augustus Spies for slander. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action on the case for slander. The words charged in the declaration are, “He (meaning plaintiff) is a thief.” On the trial the defendant denied having uttered the words. Plaintiff’s case was made in the main by the testimony of John Stiles. Mr. Stiles was at the time sheriff of Menominee county, and in *485his official capacity had received from plaintiff, who was city attorney of Menominee, some papers to serve on the defendant. The witness Stiles testified that the defendant made use of the language imputed to him by the declaration. He further testified that a controversy had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ellis v. WhteheadMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Smedley v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Ritchie v. SteniusMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Derham v. DerhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Youngs v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. FerganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Alderson v. KahleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Poleski v. Polish American Publishing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Andrews v. BoothMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Lewis v. WeidenfellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API