Cogswell v. Mitts
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Bill to cancel a chattel mortgage. Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The complainant filed a bill to compel the defendants to deliver up for cancellation a promissory note and chattel mortgage obtained from him under the circumstances detailed below:
The complainant is a householder, with a family, and on the 23d of October, 1890, applied to the defendants Mitts for a loan of $125, and offered to secure the same by a mortgage upon his exempt household furniture. They agreed to loan him $125, upon his executing a note and mortgage for $145.25, the $20.25 being for bonus and fees for recording the mortgage. The papers were prepared, and S. W. Mitts took the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sherman v. FitchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Booraem v. CraneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Shipman v. GravesMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Hitchcock v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Weed Sewing Machine Co. v. JeudevineMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by4 opinions
- Edwards v. Michigan Tontine Investment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Smith v. FotoMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Fred Macey Co. v. MaceyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Northwestern Mutual Life-Insurance v. AmosMichigan Supreme Court · 1904