Legal Opinion

Cogswell v. Mitts

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Bill to cancel a chattel mortgage. Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The complainant filed a bill to compel the defendants to deliver up for cancellation a promissory note and chattel mortgage obtained from him under the circumstances detailed below:

The complainant is a householder, with a family, and on the 23d of October, 1890, applied to the defendants Mitts for a loan of $125, and offered to secure the same by a mortgage upon his exempt household furniture. They agreed to loan him $125, upon his executing a note and mortgage for $145.25, the $20.25 being for bonus and fees for recording the mortgage. The papers were prepared, and S. W. Mitts took the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sherman v. FitchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  2. Booraem v. CraneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Shipman v. GravesMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Hitchcock v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Weed Sewing Machine Co. v. JeudevineMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Michigan Tontine Investment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Smith v. FotoMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Fred Macey Co. v. MaceyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Northwestern Mutual Life-Insurance v. AmosMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API