United States v. Patterson
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
ARROWOOD, Senior Judge:
The loss, through improper care, of tape recordings which were made of witnesses’ testimony at an Article 32 investigation did not excuse the failure to provide the tapes to the defense under the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500. Since we are unable to find this error was harmless, we reverse the conviction.
The Article 32 investigator, a reserve officer, recorded the testimony of the informant and two investigators called before him during an investigation of drug transfers from the accused. He took the tapes to his home to use in preparing the report and, upon…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Killian v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Billy Maurice Ogden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Frank Quiroz Carrasco, United States of America v. Lucindo Ruiz-OntiverosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- James Milton Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. MarshUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. BosierU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. StrandU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. RoxasNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994
- United States v. StrandU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986