United States v. Strand
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
RAPP, Judge:
We have examined the record of trial, the assignment of error in the appellant’s most recent brief, the assignments of error in his original brief before this Court and the Government’s reply thereto.
I
We will begin with the assignment of error presented to us in both the appellant’s original and most recent briefs:
Original Brief
I
THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY REFUSING TO ORDER THE GOVERNMENT TO PRODUCE THE TAPE RECORDINGS OF THE TESTIMONY OF DISBURSING CLERK THIRD CLASS E[_], SEAMAN B[_], YEOMAN SEAMAN APPRENTICE M[_], AND SEAMAN RECRUIT S[_], GIVEN AT THE ARTICLE 32 INVESTIGATIONS…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Killian v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Rosenberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Frank Quiroz Carrasco, United States of America v. Lucindo Ruiz-OntiverosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. JarrieUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. BosierU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.