Legal Opinion

Weichert Realtors v. Zink, No. Cv94 0140213 S (Oct. 22, 1996)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 22, 1996No. CV94 0140213 SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The plaintiffs, Weichert Realtors (Weichert) and Prudential Connecticut Realty (Prudential), real estate brokers, filed an action against G. Russell Zink and Margo R. Zink, seeking to recover a commission allegedly due and owing Weichert from a right to sell and Prudential as a co-broker or subagent. The defendants filed an answer and special defenses alleging that the plaintiffs failed to produce a buyer ready, willing and able to purchase their property, no closing occurred, Prudential did not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Mozzochi v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Lach v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  5. Storm Associates, Inc. v. BaumgoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API