Legal Opinion

Bell v. P & B Manufacturing Corp.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided September 18, 1985No. 85-1010PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT P & B’s MOTION TO DISMISS

TODD, District Judge.

Plaintiffs filed this action on January 18, 1985, seeking damages for a personal injury sustained by plaintiff Robert Bell. Named in the complaint as defendants were T & B Manufacturing Corporation (T & B) and Balkamp, Incorporated. The plaintiffs discovered on January 24, 1985, that the corporation that made the allegedly defective product was actually P & B Manufacturing Corporation (P & B) and amended- their complaint on January 28, 1985, changing defendant T & B to P & B. Defendant P & B has moved…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Ingram v. KumarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. Julius Korn v. Royal Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCracken v. Brentwood United Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  2. Maxwell v. Eastern Associated Coal Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Smith v. TW Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1991
  4. Haynes v. LocksDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1989
  5. Kast v. PPG Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API