Legal Opinion

Morris v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1890No. 6363PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from Grayson. Tried below before Hon. D. H. Scott.

1Opinion of the Court

HOBBY, Judge.

The plaintiff in the court below, who is the appellant here, instituted this action for the recovery of damages for injuries *19to certain real property in the Choctaw Nation of the Indian Territory, which he alleged was caused by defendant’s negligence in permitting fire to be communicated thereto. Plaintiff’s rights in the property grow out of the fact that he had acquired by marriage with an Indian woman membership in the said Choctaw tribe. Plaintiff resided in said Nation, and defendant is a Missouri corporation, having an office and agent in the county where this suit was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Great Western Railway Co. v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Thayer v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Co. v. Castro AlfaroTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Eingartner v. Illinois Steel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. CullersTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. '21' International Holdings, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
  5. Van Winkle-Hooker Company v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API