Legal Opinion
'21' International Holdings, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided May 5, 1993No. 04-92-00543-CVPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIERY, Justice.
‘21’ International Holdings, Inc., and ‘21’ International, Inc. (‘21’ International) filed suit against Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse), Knoll International, Inc. (Knoll) and Price Waterhouse in Webb County, Texas. The defendants included in their answers motions to dismiss under the doctrine of forum non conveniens and motions for transfer of venue to Dallas County. The trial court denied the motions to transfer venue, but granted the motions to dismiss under the doctrine of forum non conveniens. ‘21’ International appeals the dismissal order and, by…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cleveland v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Robinson v. Central Texas MHMR CenterTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Hamilton v. Empire Gas & Fuel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Castro AlfaroTexas Supreme Court · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- De Aguilar v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- In Re Smith Barney, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. DeLay, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Nalle v. Taco Bell Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.