Legal Opinion

Vence v. Speir

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided December 15, 1859PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Slosson, Justice.

Witnesses, who come from a distance at the request of parties, without subpoena, are entitled to the allowance for travelling expenses, and to the per-diem allowance provided by statute; but the per-diem allowance is to be restricted to the days during which the case is actually on the day calendar of the court sitting for trials, and actually in session, and the witnesses are in attendance. If they attend on the like request in two causes, they are entitled to the full allowance in each case, though the parties may be same. (19 Wendell, 82 ; 12 How. 446 ; 4 Sand. 719 ; 16…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. SwormstedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Willink v. ReceleNew York Supreme Court · 1837

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alexander v. HarrisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Smith v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Meagher v. Van ZandtNevada Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Wheeler v. RuckmanThe Superior Court of New York City · 1867

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API