Legal Opinion

Flood v. Miura

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1932No. Docket No. 7029PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRICKE, J., pro tem.

Defendant appeals from a judgment awarding damages for personal injuries resulting from a collision about 4 o’clock P. M. on April 12, 1929, between the motor-truck of appellant and a motorcycle ridden by respondent. Prior to the collision respondent was proceeding north on San Pedro Street in the city of Los Angeles and appellant’s truck was going in a westerly direction on East Ninth Street and toward the intersection of that street with San Pedro Street. While there was no proof that they were there placed in compliance with any ordinance, the record discloses that on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Rush v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. White v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Couchman v. SnellingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Keyes v. HawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clinkscales v. CarverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Christiansen v. HollingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Bramble v. McEwanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Fleming v. FlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Morris v. Purity Sausage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API