Legal Opinion

Wissmann v. Pearline

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 1940PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCULLEN, J.

This suit was brought by appellants, as plaintiffs, to recover from respondents, as defendants, a balance alleged to be due after the foreclosure of a deed of trust securing the payment of a negotiable promissory note and interest. A trial before the court and a jury resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of de-fendants. After an unavailing motion for a new trial, plaintiffs duly appealed to this court.

The petition of plaintiffs alleges that they are husband and wife, and that defendants are also husband and wife; that, on January 25, 1927, defendants became the owners of a certain piece…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Young v. Pennsylvania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  2. Fawkes v. National Refining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. Bolton v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  4. Everhart v. BrysonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  5. John Deere Plow Co. v. CooperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carthen v. Jewish Hospital of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Missey v. KwanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Schneider v. Best Truck Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Maas Bros., Inc. v. BishopDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  5. Holtmeyer v. SchererMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API