Legal Opinion
Wells Fargo Armored Services Corp. v. Sunshine Security & Detective Agency, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 7, 1989No. 88-1298PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The final order dismissing the amended complaint under review is affirmed on the ground that the subject complaint was barred by the doctrine of law of the case. We have previously held, in reversing a final default judgment entered in this cause, that the complaint upon which the final default judgment was entered wholly failed to state a cause of action. Sunshine Security & Detective Agency v. Wells Fargo Armored Servs. Corp., 496 So.2d 246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). This being so, the trial court was eminently correct in dismissing the amended complaint, filed upon remand, which realleged the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re Estate of YohnSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Palm Beach Estates v. CrokerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- ARKY, FREED v. Bowmar Instrument Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Coudry v. City of TitusvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Equibank v. KaufmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- WELLS FARGO ARM. SERVS. CORP. v. Sunshine SEC. and Detective Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1991
- DOT (SR), Inc. v. TelesurDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Wells Fargo Armored Services Corp. v. Sunshine Security & Detective Agency, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991