Legal Opinion

Veach v. State Farm Lloyds

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided May 23, 2022No. 3:19-cv-02312Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION LINDA VEACH, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:19-cv-02312-BT STATE FARM LLOYDS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant State Farm Lloyds’s post-judgment Motion (ECF No. 105) for new trial and remittitur. For the reasons explained in this Opinion, the Court GRANTS in part State Farm’s Motion reducing the amount of damages from $38,374.29 to $20,776.79. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Veach to indicate, in writing within 10 days, whether she accepts the Court’s remittitur. If Veach agrees to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Sherman Simon, Jr., Individually and as Next Friend of His Minor Children, Peter Darnell Simon and Keenan Simon, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API