Legal Opinion

Adkins v. Mireles

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 16, 2008No. 06-56005PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

This appeal arises out of a union-negotiated collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) governing employees of Lucky Stores, Ine.’s (“Lucky”) general merchandise warehouse. David Adkins and other former employees at Lucky’s Fullerton, California warehouse (collectively, “Appellants”), all members of Teamsters Local 952 (“the Union”), appeal the district court’s judgment, following a partial summary judgment and jury trial, in favor of the Union, Ed Míreles, secretary-treasurer of the Union, and Harry Ashley, president of the Union (collectively, “Appellees”).

Appel…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. City of Pomona v. Sqm North America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Department of Fair Employment & Housing v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Figueroa v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. F. WhittemoreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Christopher Jones v. E. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API